An honest account of how usable this site is, including the parts that are not good enough. If something here stops you, tell us and we will fix it.
Last updated 27 August 2026
We hold this site to WCAG 2.2, level AA. That is a target we work towards, not a certificate we hold: parts of the site meet it today and parts do not, and the two lists below say which is which.
Each of these was measured, not assumed.
These are real and we are not hiding them.
Everything the map draws also exists as text or as data. The region pages list what has been found in each place, as ordinary headings and lists. The open API serves the same data to any tool you prefer. Neither is a full replacement, and we know it.
We are not claiming compliance with the European Accessibility Act, because it is not clear that it applies to us. The Act names particular consumer services, a free open map is not obviously one of them, and micro-enterprises providing services are exempt in any case. We would rather say that plainly than imply a duty we may not have. We hold ourselves to WCAG because it is the right thing to do, not because somebody made us.
By hand, in a real browser, on a real phone: keyboard walkthroughs, contrast measured against the actual rendered background, and touch targets measured in place rather than guessed from the stylesheet. Some of it is pinned by automated tests so it cannot quietly regress. None of it involved an accessibility overlay, and it never will: those make a site worse for the people they claim to help.
So we can tell you what happened. It is not shown to anybody, not even to curators.
Paste a screenshot with Ctrl+V (Cmd+V). Up to 3.
We will tell you what happened to it.